Gilgit Baltistan and Kashmir Federal Minister for Affairs and States and Border Regions Amir Muqam on Friday slammed PTI founder Imran Khan, stating that he “prioritizes self-defense over the country’s interests”, questioning his commitment to the well-being of the nation.
Since Imran’s imprisonment last year, in several cases, the PTI’s relations with the government and establishment have deteriorated dramatically, marked by protests that frequently escalated into violence amid state repression.
Following the agitation, Imran set up a five-member committee to hold talks with “anyone”, signaling a change in the stance of PTI lawmakers in Parliament. In response, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also formed a committee with members of the ruling coalition.
The first meeting between both sides took place on December 23, while the second took place yesterday (January 2). The two sides have so far failed to make significant progress as PTI leaders sought frequent meetings with Imran to finalize their list of demands. The government and opposition will meet again, possibly next week.
In an exclusive interview with a private news channel, Muqam urged the PTI to engage in dialogue with the government to address urgent economic issues and work for the betterment of the country, instead of “pursuing a self-centered policy”.
The PTI has expressed its key demands quite clearly: a judicial commission to investigate the May 9 and November 26 violence and the release of political prisoners, including Imran.
Replying to a question, Muqam clarified that the government’s negotiating committee has no authority to decide on Imran’s release.
He added that the decision will be made by the courts, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law and allowing the judicial process to take its course.
Muqam encouraged the PTI to take the legal route, allowing the courts to determine Imran’s fate.
He also urged the PTI to seize the negotiation opportunity and make the roundtable a success, saying, “This approach can only lead to a mutually beneficial outcome, where both sides find common ground and work together to address urgent issues.”
