26th Constitutional Amendment based on ‘one letter’: IHC judge Kayani – Pakistan

The senior judge of Puisne of the Superior Court of Islamabad (IHC), the judge of Puisne, Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, said on Tuesday that the 26th constitutional amendment, which brought numerous changes related to the Judiciary, was based on “a letter.”

Going to the IHC lawyers association today, the judge praised the efforts of Islamabad’s lawyers and lawyers to preserve their rights and those of the Nation.

“Only with the correct interpretation and implementation of the law can see Pakistan in the fate of progress. For that, legal changes, even if it is the 26th constitutional amendment, cannot deter it from their purposes.

“Such stages have continued to arrive in the history of Pakistan, but they reflect on this, that letter has changed the entire system in Pakistan. I do not need to mention it, but you are all witnessing that the 26th constitutional amendment is based on a letter.

“To what extent is this sustained? I hope that at the end the full bank of the Supreme Court listens and this problem is resolved for the people of Pakistan and the good of this country, ”he said he applaud the audience.

The judge said the hearing was part of the same system that faced a myriad of problems such as missing persons and attacks against personal freedoms that were visible to all.

Despite that, he said it was important to address the above and expected the legal community to play their role for which lawyers, judges and media personnel were needed.

Speaking of complexes related to Islamabad’s bars, he joked: “The Federal Government Ministry and the Ministry of Law must pay attention that, when they cause changes in such fast law, they must immediately participate in the construction of this building. And hope is that nobody needs to write a letter for that. ”

The judge did not explain what letter he was referring to. However, he was one of the six IHC judges who wrote a surprising letter in March last year to the members of the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) regarding attempts to press the judges through the abduction and torture of His relatives, as well as secret surveillance within their homes.

Subsequently, the calls had emerged from several sectors for investigation into the investigation, in the midst of the former president of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa, convened a complete judicial meeting of the judges of the Apex court.

However, any action on the letter remains pending so far. The SJC in November considered different options related to the letter and agreed to expand the consultations, noting that the Code of Conduct of Judges applied to the heads of different institutions and judges.

Meanwhile, the Law of the Constitution (twenty sixth amendment), 2024 that became law in October last year, the legislation that eliminated the powers of Suo Motu of the Supreme Court, established the period of the President of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (CJP) at three years and trained the prime minister. to appoint the next CJP among the three most senior SC judges.

The amendment was criticized by the rush with which it was approved. The International Court of Jurists ridiculed the “coup to judicial independence” when the 26th amendment was signed.

Since then, questions have emerged about the jurisdiction of the Judge of the Supreme Court with calls for a bank of the complete court to take the appeals against the constitutional amendment and decide the matter.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *