Nueva Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday remained on Wednesday the controversial order of the Superior Court of Allahabad that indicated that “catching the breast and rope of the pajamas” were not enough to accuse a defendant with the crime of rape or try to violate.
During the hearing, the Bank of Judges Br Gavai and Ag Masih said that the HC judge, who approved the order, exhibited “total insensitivity” in the management of the case.
The Apex court said that I regret to use hard use for the judge, but that it is a serious matter and that the judge was not approved for a moment.
“Since the observations made in paragraph 24, 25, 26 are not sustainable in the law and represent insensitivity, we are inclined to maintain observation. We issue notice to the Union, Uttar Pradesh. He learned that Ag and SG can help the Court in this matter,” the live law cited a SC bank.
Also read: SC takes the request for Suo Motu of the controversial order of ‘rape of rape’ of Allahabad HC
“The general registrar is immediately to communicate the order and the place before the honorable CJ of Alld HC and take the issue that is considered appropriate,” he added.
This occurs after a superior court approved an order in relation to a case that involved two men, Pawan and Akash, who allegedly grabbed the minor’s breasts, broke their pajamas rope and tried to drag it under a sewer while walking with their mother.
Initially, they were accused under Section 376 of the IPC Law (violation) and the Law for the Protection of Children of Sexual Crimes (POCSO). However, Allahabad HC ruled that their actions did not qualify as a violation or an attempt to violation, but fell under the slightest position of aggravated sexual assault, punishable with section 354 (b) CPI and section 9 (m) of the Pocso Law.
Also read: grab Minor
The ruling of the Superior Court was based on the argument that “an attempt to commit a violation must go beyond the preparation stage and the real attempt to commit a crime consists mainly to the greater degree of determination.” “The specific accusation against Akash is that he tried to drag the victim under the sewer and broke the chain of his pajamas.
Nor do witnesses not declare that, due to this act of the accused, the victim undresses or undressed. There is no accusation that the defendants tried to commit penetrating sexual assault against the victim, “the court observed in his order. In view of this, the court said that the accusations were leveled against the accused and the facts of the case barely constituted a crime of attempt to violate in the case.