Nueva Delhi: The Supreme Court has said that the northeastern states, which is a confluence of people belonging to a mosaic of tribes, castes and ethnicities, must encourage Diversity and inclusion in public services Ensure the representation of hill candidates and historically backward classes.
The court, which is still dealing with cases related to Kuki-Meitei ethnic shocks In Manipur, which had exploded in May 2023 on the apprehensions of the granting of the state of the tribe scheduled for MEITEIS, last week confirmed the decision of the 2016 BJP government to cancel the recruitment of government interviews led by Tarun Gogoi, the recruitment of interviews of the government of the Government for the Forest Protection force of Assam as one of the state of the state was not selected.
Leaving aside concurrent judgments of a single judge and division bank of the Gauhati HC that ordered the State to grant the appointment to the 104 selected candidates, a bank of judges Dipankar Datta and Manmohan said two reasons: the selections are only based on the interview that is prone to the manipulation and non -selection of any candidate that belongs to 16 districts cancellation of the exams.
When writing the sentence, Judge Datta said: “Promote diversity and inclusion in the public service, ensuring that there is a representation of almost all districts, even of the hills and historically backward classes without, however, the compromising merit should be the commitment of all the governments of the northeastern states of the country.”
The bank expressed surprise that, although the notification for recruitment was published in 2014, the selection process was carried out in 2016. Immediately after the change in the government, the main conservative of forests (PCCF) wrote to the Government complaining that the process was not fair and beaten by nepotism.
Upon discovering that the selection process had “a discernible spot layer that suggests an impropriety and bias,” the bank said: “The decision taken by the successor government to cancel the process initiated by the previous government cannot be said to be disproportionate and disabilities with the illegalities/irregularities detected.”
“Therefore, we conclude that, according to the PCCF note of July 4, 2016, and the recommendation made by him for the cancellation of the select list, the government’s decision to approve said note and, therefore, to cancel the select list did not remain vitial to attract his invalidation by the application of the doctrino of the increase of the menchlasa of the mecha. Bebench While ordersing the State to fill the 104 agents’ positions through a transparent process.