Nueva Delhi: The Supreme Court ordered the states that devise a policy to prevent private hospitals Since wool patients forcing them to buy medications, implants and consumables of their pharmacies at inflated prices. However, the court said that such policy decisions should not become a deterrent element for private entities that wish to enter the health sector.
Elimination of a seven-year Pil that seeks instructions to the states to prevent private hostels from obliging patients/attending to buy medications and other teams of hospital or hospital pharmacy, a Bank of Judges Southy Kant and NK Singh said that the problem needed states to devise politics, and was not advisable to the court for private hospitals of Micresconma through a court order.
SC observed that people who prefer private hospitals for a luxury stay cannot complain about the illusion, since they decided not to go to a government hospital.
It’s like staying in a five -star hotel and demanding that you are allowed to bring food from a dhaba from the street, “Judge Kant said in a lighter vein.” You go to Aiims in Delhi and you know how dedicated and workers are even when the institute provides the best possible treatment to patients who are independent of your state, “he said.
The bank said that given the population size, states have not been able to create health facilities necessary to meet the needs of a growing number of patients. “The states have facilitated private entities to invest in the health sector and some of the private hospitals have created a name to provide specialized treatment,” he said that “will it be prudent that governments introduce policy frames to regulate all activities in private hospitals? The bank asked.