New Delhi: The Supreme Court ordered the center on Tuesday and Delhi government Send a joint team of experts to inspect the records of Apollo Hospital during the last five years to find out if he had fulfilled his commitment to provide Free treatment at 30% of interiors and 40% of outdoor patients according to 1994 leaseAnd he emphasized that “he would not hesitate to deliver it to all the Institute of Medical Sciences of India” if he found that he violated the agreement under which 15 acres of main lands were given in the Token rental of Re 1 per month.
A Bank of Judges Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh referred to the lease, under which the Earth was assigned to Indraprastha Medical Corporation, with Delhi Govt with a 26%participation, to establish the Apollo hospital in Mathura Road and said: “We are not sure if the hospital is providing 200 free beds to poor patients in their ease to indor.”
The additional attorney general SD Anand informed the bank that the 30 -year -old lease assigned to the Apollo Hospital had expired, which led the bank to order the center and the Government of Delhi that establishes a team of experts to inspect the hospital records during the last five years to discover if he had honored the conditions of the lease agreement.
The Bank asked the Center and the Government of Delhi to present affordments that report the court if the lease was extended and, if so, their terms and conditions.
I also wanted to know what use the land was placed and the building if the lease contract had not been renewed.
The bank led by Judge Kant asked the team of experts to discover from the hospital records the number of poor patients who received free treatment in outdoor and interior facilities in the last five years. He directed the Hospital Management to cooperate with the Expert Registries exam.
The Court also asked the hospital to present an affidavit that provides details of the free treatment of poor patients and registered the matter for an additional hearing after four weeks while issuing a warning that “if the hospital is not executing properly and according to the lease contract, we do not hesitate to give his career to Aiim.”
Referring to the Judgment of the Superior Court of Delhi of September 22, 2009, SC said it was evident that the hospital administration had not adhered to the free treatment obligations stipulated in the lease. He said that the HC had issued a series of instructions to guarantee a free treatment to the specified percentage of poor patients despite the fact that hospital management took a position that it was a commercial company.
Delhi HC had said to his sentence: “The Earth was delivered to the hospital with an income file of Re 1 per month. In addition to the Earth, GNCTD contributed substantially to the capital of capital, as well as to the construction of the hospital.
