On Friday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs categorically rejected the “unfounded, provocative and irresponsible accusations” made by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who in a heated speech accused Pakistan of carrying out terrorist attacks in his country.
The military confrontation between New Delhi and Islamabad occurred when the tensions about Pahalgam’s attack last month continued to increase, since India, without evidence, blamed Pakistan for the attack. On the night of May 6 to 7, India launched a series of air attacks in Punjab and Azad Kashmir, which resulted in Civil Low. Islamabad responded by demolishing five Indian planes.
After intercepting drones sent by India and Tit-For-Tat attacks in the other air bases, an American intervention was needed on May 10 for both parties to finally drop their weapons and declare a stop the fire. Since then, India has continued its aggressive position, even when Pakistan warned of any additional military aggression and offered conversations.
Yesterday, the Indian prime minister said that Pakistan would not obtain water from the rivers on which India has rights.
According to a statement issued by the FO in X Today, “Pakistan categorically rejects the unfounded, provocative and irresponsible accusations made by the Indian Prime Minister during a recent public speech in Rajasthan.
“The comments, full of distortions, misrepresentations and inflammatory rhetoric, are clearly destined to enliven regional tensions for narrow political profits,” FO said, adding that such statements not only reflect a deliberate attempt to deceive the public, but also violate the rules responsible for statification.
“Resorting to threats and boasting military action against a sovereign nation is a serious violation of the United Nations Charter and the established principles of international law,” said the FO.
“This dangerous approach undermines regional peace and stability,” he added.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Pakistan remained a “consistent and proactive partner in the worldwide struggle against terrorism.”
“Any insinuation that seeks Pakistan associated with acts of terrorism is in an incorrect and, obviously misleading fact,” he continued.
He pointed out that the tactics of the Indian prime minister was “often used to divert the attention of the internal challenges of India”, adding that the Indian attempts to mask their “serious violations of human rights” in the assholed back when dripping to Pakistan were well documented and more recognized by the international community.
“The difficult situation of the people of Kashmir and their fair struggle for self -determination cannot be darkened by aggressive rhetoric and political deflection.”
Pakistan urged Indian leadership to “exercise responsibility and moderation,” said the fo.
“The stairs statements and the belligerent posture have no other purpose than to exacerbate tensions.
“Instead of resorting to fictitious narratives and warming for electoral mileage, India should demonstrate maturity by solving outstanding disputes through the Pacific dialogue and diplomacy,” said Fo.
He added that Pakistan remained firmly committed to “peaceful coexistence, regional stability and constructive commitment.”
“However, our desire for peace should not be misunderstood as weakness,” he said, adding that armed people and forced were “completely prepared and capable of defending the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.”
“Any misadventure or aggression will be fulfilled with a resolved and proportional response,” fo added.
He said that Pakistan has demonstrated his resolution in the past and will do so again, if necessary.
“The international community must take serious notes of the aggressive position of India and the narratives based on hate that threaten regional peace,” he said, he added that it was “imperative to discourage such rhetoric and actions to preserve stability in southern Asia.”
“The glorification of the conflict does not benefit anyone, and the path to lasting peace lies in dialogue, mutual respect and adhesion to international law,” he concluded.
