Pakistan’s envoy to the United States has asked the global community to solve the Kashmir’s dispute, qualifying the “central problem” of the recent complete breakdown of ties with India following Pahalgam’s attack.
The April 22 attack in Pahalgam killed 26 people, mostly tourists, in one of the most mortal assaults since 2000. India has implied cross -border links without evidence, while Pakistan has rejected the claim and has requested a neutral investigation.
Since then, the tensions have shot themselves, with Pakistan reinforcing their forces, since he expected an incursion and the prime minister of India that grants “operational freedom” to his military. As temperatures remain high, with a military warning of a “resolved” response to any misfortune by New Delhi, diplomatic channels have been committed to avoid conflicts.
“It could be an important part of the president [Donald] Trump’s legacy to address this situation, not with a band help solution, but when addressing the central theme: the Kashmir Fox News Digital Posted today.
“This is a nuclear inflammation point,” said the envoy.
Sheikh’s statement echoes his recent call to Trump to intervene and help relieve rising tensions with India. He had stressed that as president “defend peace in the world as a pronounced objective during this administration”, there was no “higher or more prominent flash point” than the problem of Kashmir.
Trump, in his inaugural speech as the president of the United States, had said: “My most proud legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier.”
A high fire, which since then has been broken, secured between Israel and Hamas after Trump’s elections, and has also been involved with Ukraine and Russia to stop his war.
During your interview with Fox NewsSheikh also asked nations around the world to help with a lasting agreement for the Kashmiro problem.
He said: “Previously, when the situation has been at this level or tensions have intensified, the international community has attended the situation, but has taken its eyes [and] Attention far, even before the situation could be completely spread.
“This time, maybe it would be […] timely in terms of the situation in other parts of the world, with similar instances, […] Maybe not pay a help solution, but to address the broader problem. “
“Any misadventure or calculation error can lead to a nuclear interface,” said the ambassador. “That is certainly not desirable in such a densely populated region.”
“We want a Pacific neighborhood,” Sheikh emphasized, adding that Pakistan didn’t want any instability in the region.
However, he emphasized, the desire for Pakistan’s peace “should not be misunderstood as a sign of weakness.” “We want peace with dignity.”
Sheikh described India’s response to Pahalgam’s attack as dangerously premature and inflammatory, according to the report.
The envoy reiterated the offer of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to celebrate an “neutral and transparent” investigation into the attack of the pahalgama. He pointed out that both the research offer and the request for evidence of Pakistan that link it to the attack had become “unanswered.”
“A few minutes away from the attack, India began leveling the accusations against Pakistan,” he said, and said that a report after the investigation was presented only 10 minutes after the incident occurred, despite the remote and resistant terrain near the scene.
The ambassador warned that the region was being delayed once again “as a hostage of the hysteria war” by the government and the media of India, who immediately “began to overcome the battery of war.”
On the accusations involved by India, who has not yet appointed Pakistan or any entity directly, Sheikh said that the suspects were Indian citizens whose houses have already been raided.
He questioned why India is looking outside its borders instead of addressing “administrative deficiencies” in occupied Kashmir. Hatalized the broader policies of India in Held Cashmira, including the alleged settlement of non -residents in the region.
Speaking about the unilateral suspension of India of the Indo Water Treaty, Ambassador Sheikh said: “That is so seriously possible. This is a treaty that has resisted wars between India and Pakistan.”
The Minister of Law, Azam Nazeer, Tarar, said yesterday that Pakistan’s final response to India’s letters on the IWT would be prepared in consultation with all relevant ministries, including foreign issues, water resources and law.
The Minister of State of Law and Justice, Aqeel Malik, also said that Islamabad would address international forums, including the World Bank that negotiated it, with respect to the suspension of the treaty.
