For three years, Mike Davis, a republican lawyer and former legal advisor of Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, has pressed the federal criminal investigations of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Altos FBI, CIA and officials of the Department of Justice.
Now, a series of recent investigations approved by Attorney General PAM Bondi suggests to Davis that his very wanted goal is very likely to approach.
Bondi approved this month two federal criminal investigations of the New York Attorney General Letitia James and one of the Senators Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Bondi also instructed an unidentified federal prosecutor to begin an investigation by the Grand Jury on whether Obama administration committed federal crimes when they evaluated Russia’s actions during the 2016 elections.
Bondi’s order occurred weeks after the national director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama and his assistants of a “traitorous conspiracy” and said he had sent a criminal derivation to the Department of Justice.
Davis applauded Bondi’s actions in a recent interview.
“This is the greatest conspiracy in the history of the United States,” he said, referring to what he says are democratic frames against President Donald Trump. “There must be the most serious legal, political and financial consequences for this unprecedented weapon. This should never happen again.”
Bondi’s office and the White House did not immediately respond to comments requests. Obama, Biden, Clinton and the former FBI, the officials of the Department of Justice and the CIA have repeatedly dismissed the accusations. Democrats say that new probes are an effort to distract the attention of accusations that Trump has abused his power in his second term and his failure to free Jeffrey Epstein’s archives.
The former Department of Justice Senior and FBI officials point out that a special advisor appointed by Trump and the Republican senators have already investigated the claims and did not find crimes. They called the idea “absurd”, “bananas” and “crazy.”
Davis said he does not know Bondi’s next step. But he praised the recent confirmation of the Senate of the party of a new US prosecutor.
“I want Jason to establish his own grand jury and pursue this aggressively,” Davis said. “And I want me to put criminals in prison for a long time.”
Route map for federal investigation by Florida
Davis asked that Quiñones summon a special federal jury in Port St. Lucie, the headquarters of St. Lucie County, which Trump took to 10 percentage points last year. He would investigate what he calls a democratic conspiracy to undermine Trump that extends from the 2016 campaign to the search for the FBI 2022 of his Mar-A-Lago farm until today.
Quiñones, a Miami-Dade County judge appointed by the governor of Florida Ron Desantis a year ago, is a former federal prosecutor in Miami and a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. He was an important prosecutor, but received low performance evaluations, Miami Herald reported. Quiñones presented and eliminated a complaint of racial discrimination and moved to the civil division, where he received satisfactory reviews.
Quiñones and the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to comments requests.
Seeing the search for Mar-A-Lago as part of a decadelization anti-trump conspiracy has a legal purpose: prosecutors could allow the alleged acts of 2016 and 2017 as part of a single conspiracy and avoid a statute of five-year limitations in the charges of denial of rights.
Three former FBI officials and the Department of Justice with direct knowledge of the search for Mar-A-Lago told NBC News that it was carried out properly and approved by a federal judge and was the result of Trump’s own actions.
The officials said the national archives first alerted them that Trump seemed to have classified materials. Trump then rejected repeated requests to return the documents for one year. A former official of the Superior Justice dismissed Davis’s calls for a criminal investigation of the search for Mar-a-lago.
“He is outrageous,” said the former official of the Department of Justice.
Multiple investigations of democratic rivals
Three people familiar with the matter confirmed to NBC News this month that the Department of Justice opened a federal criminal investigation of the demands that James’s office presented against Trump. James has dismissed the investigation of the Department of Justice, which is based on Albany, New York, as a political recovery.
James’s investigation is examining whether the State Attorney General’s office committed “Rights Conspiracy” and violated Trump’s civil rights when he brought a lawsuit that said Trump greatly inflated the values of his assets to obtain personal profits. A judge from Manhattan ruled last year that Trump did and ordered him to pay a fine of approximately $ 500 million, a ruling that enraged him.
Separately, the Department of Justice of Bondi has launched a criminal investigation in Virginia on the possible mortgage fraud of James and another in Schiff in relation to an accusation of potential mortgage fraud in Maryland. James and Schiff have said that investigations are political remuneration. Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a loyal to Trump that represented the defendants of January 6 and praised Trump’s massive forgives from them, to supervise both probes.
Davis said the position of “conspiracy against rights” could be used in Florida’s investigation that he thinks should be carried out. Legal experts have indicated that the position was created by the 1870 compliance law, which Congress approved to prevent whites from blocking slaves released from voting.
Davis said the special lawyer Jack Smith used the same position when he accused Trump of trying to illegally reverse the result of the 2020 elections.
“The Democrats established the precedent that former presidents are a fair game,” Davis said.
Could the Democrats be accused and convicted?
Daniel Richman, former federal prosecutor and professor at the Faculty of Law of Columbia to whom Republicans have accused of conspiring with former FBI director James Comey, said it is possible to present criminal charges based on discredited claims. “If you are willing to ignore the facts,” said Richman, “you can present criminal charges.”
But Richman warned that ensuring federal accusation, trial and condemnation, even in areas where most voters voted for Trump, it would be difficult given the many actors and elements involved. Prosecutors need accusations of great jurors, judges can dismiss weak cases, witnesses must be credible and jurors should unanimously agree to blame.
“The jury members take their duties seriously,” Richman said. “I am not ready to say that people in these jurisdictions are totally in the tank for this administration.”
A former National Security official who spoke anonymously, citing the public attacks of the Trump administration against former officials, suggested two potential scenarios: “Any of the Bondi and Gabbard know that in fact there is no evidence of any criminal activity, in which case it is completely corrupt and a political acrobatics,” said the former official, “or darker, they really believe that this thing is really And this is something or is something that is something of Owell “or that is something that something is done or is something that is something of Owell.
