Nueva Delhi: Days after BJP defeated AAP in the Assembly surveys, the Delhi Government Department has sought details of all judicial cases presented by the outgoing dispensation against the center and the lieutenant governor in recent years .
The sources said that more than 300 million rupees were spent on “between departments” and judicial battles between the AAP government and the center or the LG in recent years. It also resulted in the loss of horrible man hours, which now needed to be cut. They added that a complete report on the ongoing litigation would be presented before the new dispensation to be considered.
The AAP government, the LG and the center were involved in frequent fights on various issues related to governance, which resulted in a series of judicial cases. There was an increase in the number of judicial cases after VK Saxen It brings ‘services’ under the domain of LG and the formation of a high -level committee, with Saxena as its president, to avoid pollution in Yamuna.
‘Government probably moved to court to withdraw all those cases’
A senior official of the Delhi Government said that it was the central government led by BJP that decided that the issues related to the services in the Delhi government should be under the direct control of the LG and present an ordinance after the Supreme Court would decide otherwise, subsequently supporting. A law on the subject.
“With BJP now in the position in Delhi, there will be no need to continue these cases. The new dispensation may want to move the court to withdraw such cases,” said an official. “The withdrawal of these cases will also eliminate unnecessary friction between the center/LG and the chosen dispensation, and the two will be able to develop a cordial relationship and work towards the development of the city,” he added.
In an internal communication to all the additional main secretaries, main secretaries and secretaries, the Department of Justice, Justice and Legislative Affairs of Delhi requested the detailed list of all cases, mentioning the issue involved in the case, the latest addresses issued by the respective court, and the responses presented by the department in question.
The Law Department also sought to know the names of the lawyer participated by the principal minister or the ministers in the outgoing dispensation, the details of the defense lawyer of the administrative department and the next hearing date in each case.
In a separate office memorandum, the Law Department advised the permanent lawyer, an additional permanent lawyer and an empanado lawyer to ensure that the written and verbal statements made by them before any court is strictly in line with the written instructions written that are They give them the approval of the approval of the administrative secretary of the department in question.