After months of round trip during which the Trump administration cut funds on accusations of anti -Semitism and Harvard took legal actions, a judge ordered the government last week to restore the funds. The administration said it will appeal.
Even so, the ruling sends a powerful message, says Vera Eidelman, lawyer for senior personnel of the Discourse, Privacy and Technology Project of the American Union of Civil Liberties.
“The government cannot punish speakers, including private institutions, including academic institutions, for not agreeing with their worldview and not being willing to succumb to their ideological harassment,” Eidelman said about the order.
It is against this strip and loosen that staff members and students are concerned about freedom of expression. And have a wide range of beliefs.
Of the more than half a dozen students with whom NBC spoke, some felt that the school would continue to be a safe space for debate and freedom of expression. However, almost everyone pointed out a great concern for international students.
While this group would generally ask in guidance for standard orientation about school courses, this year’s international students were asking specific questions about what to do if Ice stop, said the co -president of the ABDULLAH SHAHID SIAL student body. He is from Pakistan and was helping the first -year international students acclimatize with the life of the campus.
“In general, the questions I get from them are:” What are the best classes to take? Who are the right teachers to learn? “Saial said.” This time, in literally 80%, the questions were: “What do we do if immigration stops? Who should we call if we are detained? What do we do if someone appears at our door?”
Throughout the country, the Trump administration has attacked thousands of international students, revoking visas and ending the immigration status before the courts intervened. The administration seemed to point to the students who participated in political activism or have criminal charges against them. In Harvard, the government made multiple attempts during the summer to stop the school’s ability to register international students. These attempts were blocked in court.
But Sial said that, as someone who has been involved in the protests and the defense of the campus, his personal fears around deportation do not exceed their duty to speak.
“That is something that I have done a complete mental peace, that if the worst becomes worse … I look this time and I can proudly say to my family, tell my children that his father defended the right thing,” said Sial, who is also a co -founder of students for freedom, a coalition that opposes the attacks of the Trump administration in higher education.
A second year student from Malaysia, who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals, said he hoped to remain a vowel on the campus, but is prepared for any development. Already last semester, when the rumors started that the ice agents were in the area, the students said they took precautions.
“I didn’t go to class that day. I made my friends bring me food,” he said. “I was being hyper cautious.”
But Harvard students are creative, he said, and although many international academics may not feel that they are able to be as visible as before, protest methods will probably evolve and self -expression will not be mitigated, he said. The methods will simply change.

Jacqueline Metzger, Junior from Washington, DC, said he hopes that many students have more caution, even outside the classroom. He cited the fact that Harvard closed the spaces previously used for the Center and Women’s Office of the Student Life BglTQ, reorganizing the staff to the Harvard Foundation, which supports the programming that “shows the wide spectrum of life experiences,” said his website. And that, Metzger said, spoke a lot about the preservation of safe spaces.
“There are so many problems that lead to being a woman on the campus, much less a woman of color, and just having that space where I could sit and talk and not feel that I have to monitor my words was really useful for me,” Metzger said. “As we have these new classes that arrive in Harvard, that will now establish the tone for the next four years. These will be students who did not have those experiences.”
The closures, in addition to the change of quiet name of the diversity, equity and inclusion offices of several of their postgraduate schools, have made many students who spoke with NBC News doubt that the school protects them against the threats of the Trump administration. Some saw the movements as a betrayal of the campus community and a small concession to the administration’s demands.

Enos said that the school has published guidelines, encouraging teachers to institute rules that dictate that discussions do not leave the classroom. But that is difficult to enforce and not a sufficient way to support students, said ENOS. After numerous international students throughout the country seemed to be the objective of deportation about their writings and beliefs, that fear has remained with the students, said ENOS.
“I would like to listen to the Harvard administration say: ‘We are never going to let that happen to one of our students. We are going to fight that with everything we have if something would happen to our students,'” said ENOS.
Months before the students were finishing their class schedules and passing to the first year students in their new bedrooms, the Trump administration had already begun to face the institution in April when it froze $ 2.2 billion in grants in response to Harvard rejected their list of demands that were aimed at addressing anti -Semitism on campus.
In the Government’s work group list to combat anti -Semitism was to restrict the acceptance of international students who are “hostile to US values and institutions.” Another element that took a public reaction was the idea that a third would audit programs that the Trump administration says that “combines anti -Semitic harassment or reflects ideological capture.”
Harvard then fought a legal battle, accusing the administration of an “unprecedented and inappropriate” control over the Ivy League institution. Weeks ago, the holidays seemed to be in conversations, approaching an agreement that would restore lost funds. But much has not been revealed since then.