Nueva Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday witnessed a heated words between the lawyers and the bank after the court arrested a Lawyer in the Registry (Aor) for presenting a “vexatory litigation” in a Criminal case And he sought explanation.
After a Bank of Judges, Bela M Trivedi and SáSH Chandra Sharma passed an order against Aor P soma sundaram, asking him to explain why contempt of court The action should not begin against him, the lawyers, who were present, expressed their objection to the order and begged the court to keep it for the moment.
The defenders said that the approved order was preconceived and the lawyer in question must be heard first. The bank said everyone should be aware of what is happening in the Court and disapproved of the lawyer’s conduct. SC, from then on, approved a modified order after registering the objections raised by the lawyers.
“In accordance with the Order approved by us on March 28, AOR and the lawyers are present … they fulfilled an unconditional apology. When we began to issue the order, the representatives of SCBA (Bar of the Supreme Court of the Court) and Scaora (the Supreme Court advocates by the Association of Recurres) Second SLP order for the SLP order.
In the case, the defendants were sentenced by a Crime Court under the SC/ ST ACT and sentenced to three years in jail. Their appeals were dismissed by the Madras HC, after which SC transferred challenging the HC sentence and also sought to exempted the delivery, but this was dismissed. According to SC, the petitioner once again presented an appeal in Top Court through the same aor, SucTARAM, and again sought the exemption of delivery.