A United States Court of Appeals said Friday that the Trump administration could temporarily implement a prohibition of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in federal agencies and companies with government contracts, which had been blocked by a judge.
The Fourth Court of Appeals of the United States circuit based in Richmond, Virginia, said the directives of President Donald Trump, including an order urging the Department of Justice to investigate companies with DEI policies, were probably constitutional, disagree with a February decision of a federal judge in Maryland.
But two of the three judges in the 4th circuit panel wrote separately that they did not agree with the substance of Trump’s orders and that the agencies that implement them can risk violating the constitution of the United States.
“Although Vitriolo now accumulates in Dei, people in good faith who work to promote diversity, equity and inclusion deserve praise, not opprobble,” wrote circuit judge Albert Díaz.
The circuit judge Allison Rushing, designated by Trump, replied that the political opinions of her colleagues were irrelevant to whether Trump’s directives should be standing.
“The opinion of a judge that Dei’s programs deserve praise, no opprobrium” should not play absolutely any role in deciding this case, “Rushing wrote.
Follow the live policy coverage here
The decision, in a demand from the city of Baltimore and three groups, will remain in force waiting for the result of the appeal of the Trump administration, which could take months.
The White House and the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to comments requests. A democracy forward spokesman, a leftist group that represents the plaintiffs, said the decision was being reviewed.
The orders are part of Trump’s greatest efforts to eradicate Dei’s initiatives, that he and other critics say they are discriminatory, government and private sector.
The American district judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore had blocked Trump and several federal agencies to implement orders throughout the country waiting for the outcome of the lawsuit.
Together with the direction of federal agencies that eliminate diversity programs, Trump also prohibited federal contractors, which include many of the largest American companies, have them.
He also told the Department of Justice and other agencies that identify companies, schools and non -profit organizations that can illegally discriminate through Dei’s policies.
Baltimore and the groups that demanded that Trump lacked the power to issue the orders, which said he was directed inappropriately to constitutionally protected freedom of expression.
The Trump administration has argued that orders do not prohibit or discourage any speech, but were attacked to illegal discrimination.
The plaintiffs this week had accused the Trump administration of challenging the ruling by continuing to condition some federal contracts on the recipients who agreed not to implement Dei programs.
Abelson held a hearing on the matter on Friday, but did not issue any other decision.
