Dawn.com analyzes some of the reports and analysis of the whole world on the high fire, and what comes next.
“If this high fire is maintained, then the next weeks will see a new battle: stories.”
This is what the international security correspondent Jason Burke wrote in an analysis for GuardianOnly a few hours after the fire was reached, negotiated by the United States, between India and Pakistan.
While the neighbors with nuclear weapons announced the last minute news, the international media sifted through a swirl of misinformation and conflicting government statements.
The escalation among the neighbors with nuclear weapons began after the April 22 attack in the pahalgama of Kashmir occupied by India, which killed 26 people. India, without research or evidence, implied “cross -border links” of the attackers. Pakistan firmly rejected the claim and requested a neutral probe. After the accusations, India launched a series of drone strikes on Pakistan, which resulted in civilian casualties.
Both parties launched missiles to each other, which extended during the week before the president of the United States, Trump announced yesterday that a “high and immediate fire” was reached “between the two countries. There were reports on both sides that the high fire had been violated; However, both parties reaffirmed their commitment to adhere to the truce.
Here, Dawn.com Look at some of the world’s reports and analysis on the high fire, and what comes after that.
The guardian – If El Alto El Fuego de India and Pakistan remains, the next few weeks will see a new battle: of narratives
“Twenty years ago, a combination of Indian military success and pressure from the United States caused an unstable peace that survived a rink of skames a decade later until it broke again.
“In this new confrontation, Washington’s influence seems to have been key to achieving decallation. This will not please Russia and China, both maneuvers for a greater influence in the region, even if the reported participation of Turkey and Saudi Arabia is a useful reminder that the unipolar days of the late 90s disappear.
“The victims this time have been mercifully low, and the limited economic damage. The last instead of the former may have weighed a lot in the decision to stop hostilities. No nation can afford the type of destruction and interruption that could have introduced the next level of war. There are links that bind, so much that they are divided.”
Al Jazeera – India tried to project strength but ended up showing weakness
“The announcement of Alto el Fuego of the president of the United States seems to have been perceived by some in India as a sign of the withdrawal of the Modi government under the pressure of the United States, while its offer of mediating in Kashmir is being seen as an indication that the rejection of the Indian of the intervention of third parties is being undermined.
“In the geopolitics of southern Asia, perception often exceeds reality, until reality bites. India has long projected regional domain, reinforced by economic growth and nuclear power.”
The wire -Decisions, direct lines and mediators: the diplomacy led by the United States that led to Alto the fire of India-Pakistan
“While there is no doubt that the technical mechanics of Alto El Fuego was created by the two DGMO without external mediation, the fact that they spoke and signed negotiations was clearly the product of a broader diplomatic and political process promoted by Washington by Washington by a treuco in which the leaders of India and Pakistan agreed Truce
Sky News – India and Pakistan were close to the calculation error that any of the parties could not pay
“He [ceasefire] Deal does not undone the events of the last two weeks, which will continue to weigh a lot in the minds of many here. Military action has been the most significant between countries in decades and dozens have died on both sides.
“But its enmity has been durable, and even with the established agreement, it feels a little complacent assume that India and Pakistan will return from the edge.”
Time magazine – Why the Gulf states, more than the United States, are key to preventing war between India and Pakistan
“[…] They are interests, instead of values or ideology, which are ultimately promoting all regional actors marks a different deviation from orthodoxy. For a long time, Pakistan clung to the idea that, as a Muslim state, he had a greater claim for gulf loyalty compared to India. Today, however, despite religious differences and divergent value systems, India has become a very significant actor in the Gulf. “
The Washington Post -It United States helped deliver the fire of India-Pakistan. But can it be sustained?
“The comments greatly express skepticism about the role of the United States in the mediation of a high fire between India and Pakistan, and many doubt the participation or effectiveness of the Trump administration. Several comments highlight that both India and Pakistan have denied US mediation.”
