Nueva Delhi: The Supreme Court refused Tuesday to entertain a Pil, which alleged spiral incidents of violence against Muslims by groups of cow guards, saying that it has already established mandatory guidelines for the police to act against incidents against the incidents of the mafia and that he must prosecute the harmed persons move the jurisdictional superior courts for relief.
“Sitting in Delhi we cannot monitor the incidents that occur in different areas of several states of the country. Such microgestion is not feasible, ”said a Bank of Judges Br Gavai and K Vinod Chandran.
However, he said that the infraction of the guidelines to treat incidents of the Litera of the Mafia established in the 2018 trial in TEHSEEN POONAWALL CASEThat it is intended to be implemented in Letter and Spirit by the police and all the other concerned authorities, then the harmed parties can move the HC in question that they seek the repair of their complaints.
The general lawyer Tushar Mehta said that Bhartiya Nyaya Samhita has incorporated the litigation of the mafia as a specific crime and is the responsibility of the states to implement the criminal laws. “For each incident that occurs in the corner and corner of the country, a pil cannot appear directly in the Supreme Court without going through the Jurisdictional HC,” he said.
Appearing for the National Federation of Indian Women of the petitioner, the wing of women of the CPI, the lawyer Nizamuddin Pasha told the bank that after the petitioner he points out a large number of incidents of groups of cow guards aimed at the Muslims and the police and the police Registering cases against Muslims and not against those who in violence, the court had requested affidavits of all states. The answers show not implementation of Tehseen Poonowala guidelines.
The bank went to the other supplication of the petitioner that demanded a minimum uniform compensation for the victims of the Litigation of the Mafia. He refused to do so by saying that compensation cannot be the same for those who suffer minor and serious injuries. Fixing a minimum uniform compensation would eliminate the discretion of the courts and the authorities to provide appropriate amounts to the victims, he said.
The petitioner had also challenged the provisions in the laws promulgated by 13 states that even authorize private persons to inspect the facilities in the suspicion that is used for cows killing or contraband cattle. He said that legal duties cannot delegate to private persons.
However, the bank said that each legal provision must be tested individually and that the SC cannot enter an exercise for the generic evidence of the validity of all these laws. Those harmed by the provisions of these laws would have to move the state HC worried to challenge their validity.