NEW DELHI: Tahawwur RanaOne of the main conspirators of Mumbai’s attack 2008, had contacted David Coleman Headley 231 times during his visits to India before carnage 26/11, according to the Indian file on him. Frog He made eight recognition missions and the largest number of calls (66) were made during the final visit before the attack.
According to the file, Rana and Headley, together with other agents, had mapped other objectives in India, including National Defense College and India Gate in Delhi and multiple Jewish centers, as part of their plan to carry out spectacular terrorist attacks. The NIA charges details Rana, along with Headley, Hafeez Saeed, Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, Ilyas Kashmiri, Sajid Mir and Major Iqbal, among others, had conspired to orchestrate the attack.
The investigation of India and the USA confirmed that the Immigration firm based in Rana Chicago, Immigration Services First World, was used as a front to facilitate Headley’s entry into India. Head And Rana had an exhaustive discussion about his future plans when they met us. “As a frog was an army deserter, Headley offered assistance through his connection with Major Iqbal,” says the file.

Backed by the ISI, Rana exploded all the options available for him to frustrate his extradition. He even claimed double danger/double prosecution, which essentially maintains that a person cannot be prosecuted twice for the same crime. However, the United States Court rejected its claim that the American judiciary had already tried and absolute it for charges for which India wanted it. The United States court said that the crimes that had been accused in India were different from those that was prosecuted in the United States. “For example, the falsification charges of India are based partly on a conduct that was not accused in the United States,” the court observed.
Rana’s conviction in 2013 in the US, where he was sentenced to 14 years in prison, was to support the Pakistani terrorist group Lashkar-E-Taiba and the plot of terror in Denmark. Rana was declared guilty of conspiracy to provide material support to a plot from October 2008 to October 2009 to commit a murder in Denmark, including a plan to decapitate the employees of Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, a Danish newspaper that published a cartoon of the ProphetAnd he throws his head to the streets of Copenhagen, in addition to providing material support, from the end of 2005 to October 2009, to Lashkar-E-Taiba.
The website of the Federal Prison Office of the United States has updated the State against the Rana name saying that it was not in its custody as of Tuesday. Rana registration number (22829-424) Read: “It is not in BOP custody at 04/08/2025”.
A team of officials extracted from Indian agencies in the United States had the task of facilitating their return. The sources said the research director, DIG (NIA) Jaya Roy, signed the ‘Delivery Order’ on Tuesday, after which quick arrangements were made to fly to Delhi. The team went on Wednesday around 6.30 in the morning, with the aim of completing the trip with a brief stop in boxes. By the way, NIA is directed by Sadanand dateAn IPS officer from Maharashtra who, along with other colleagues, had rushed the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus area on the fateful night of November 26, 2008 after terrorists attacked the objectives selected by, among others, frog companion in the massacre David Coleman Headley.
Rana’s interrogators said a source, will be aimed at disseminating details about the Pakistani state actors involved in plot 26/11, the details of the ISI network, as well as local collaborators and sources of financing. There also seems to be recognized that breaking a hardened terrorist, especially one motivated by jihad, may not be easy.
“He has already been proude widely, and breaking it will not be an easy task. I would know where we will fool ourselves and create smoke curtains. This will take a long time,” said a known source.
You learn that Rana (64) has already obtained his contacts to involve his defense lawyer. Due to security reasons, Rana cannot be carried out to the Court and its return procedures can be carried out in the Chamber, the sources said.